Question: Q: Considering Mac Pro base 8 core 2.26*2 Processor or i7 iMac. I am considering either an i7 iMac or a Mac Pro 8 core low end model. I have a monitor and I am needing to have a second monitor. Some use is for style and other use for actual video editing/music/photo editing. I have a budget of 4 grand and I get discounts with. For the ultimate Mac video-and-photo machine, though, you might want to wait for the Mac Pro to arrive in 2019. Desktop PCs I used to believe that the best way to get the maximum power for your. Hi everybody! First of all I apologize if similar thread exist. I searched but didn't find. I have iMac24' Core2Duo 2.8GHz with 4GB RAM, Mountain Lion and latest Aperture which I use for editing Canon 5d mk2 RAW files and it is sooo slow! Some times when I use dodge brush and use it on highlights only I have to wait 10-15 seconds just to see the result of brush stroke etc. When I use Aperture I have to close all other programs to make is usable which is also annoying. It is slightly faster when I use Lightroom but I don't like Lightroom. I have opportunity to buy used Mac pro Xeon quad-core 2.66 GHz, 8GB RAM for fair price so I was wondering how much faster is that computer from the one I own now? Would I notice a big difference or is it not worth spending money on that one? I would like to do some video editing too in future. Pule_st wrote: I have iMac24' Core2Duo 2.8GHz with 4GB RAM, Mountain Lion and latest Aperture which I use for editing Canon 5d mk2 RAW files and it is sooo slow! This is probably an 'iMac (24-inch Early 2008)' (iMac8,1). ![]() MacTracker says that this model has two memory slots, and that while the official RAM limit is 4.0 GB, you can actually install 6.0 GB. I have opportunity to buy used Mac pro Xeon quad-core 2.66 GHz, 8GB RAM for fair price so I was wondering how much faster is that computer from the one I own now? Would I notice a big difference or is it not worth spending money on that one? I would like to do some video editing too in future. The only Mac Pro I can find in MacTracker that was available with a single 2.66 MHz quad-core CPU is the Mac Pro (Early 2009). They list an (oversimplified) benchmark score of 8144 for it, versus one of 3728 for the older iMac. As to how much performance improvement you would see, I think that depends on two things: * How many of your applications take advantage of quad cores. Good music software for windows 10. Buy kerbal space program. * Whether you make use of the extra internal expandability of the Mac Pro. That model supports 16 GB of RAM (single-CPU machine), and you can have up to four HDs or SSDs with full-speed SATA connections before you have to go to slower external connection methods like Firewire or USB. I suspect that with 16 GB of RAM, and maybe a second internal HD or SSD, you would notice a huge difference. You need to find out what Xeon that MP is using as looking at geekbench scores (Not exact - but a guide as which is faster) Your iMac = 3833 2.66 MP = 5286 or 8266 depending on the age/xeon. None of these scores is 'amazing' when compared to newer machines. My macbook scores 13,258 for example So you could see a noticeable improvement or you could see quite a large improvement. If the code your running is single threading and therefore not written to get the best out of a quad core you might even see a small decrease moving from a 2.8 to 2.6.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |